About Us
EFRAG Facts
Annual Reviews
EFRAG Technical Expert Group (EFRAG TEG)
EFRAG Working Groups
EFRAG Supervisory Board & Member Organisations
EFRAG Governance and Nominating Committee
Legal
EFRAG Plus
Secretariat
Vacancies
subscribe/unsubscribe to EFRAG News
Contact
Projects
IASs and related Projects
IFRSs and related Projects
Interpretations related Projects
Other IASB / IFRIC Projects
Other Projects
Pro-active activities
Meetings
Calendar
Upcoming Meetings
CFSS
EFRAG PRC
EFRAG Supervisory Board (EFRAG SB)
Financial Instruments WG
Insurance Accounting WG
Proactive - Business Combination under Common Control Advisory Panel (BCUCC)
Proactive Business Model Advisory Panel (BMAP)
Proactive Disclosure Framework Advisory Panel (DFAP)
Proactive Tax Advisory Panel
RR Field-testing
SME Working Group (SME WG)
TEG
User Panel
Meeting Archive
CFSS
EFRAG PRC
EFRAG Supervisory Board (EFRAG SB)
Financial Instruments WG
Insurance Accounting WG
Proactive - Business Combination under Common Control Advisory Panel (BCUCC)
Proactive Business Model Advisory Panel (BMAP)
Proactive Disclosure Framework Advisory Panel (DFAP)
Proactive Tax Advisory Panel
RR Field-testing
SME Working Group (SME WG)
TEG
User Panel
Proactive Activities
Endorsement Status
RSS-Feed
Restricted Area: login:
password:
31/01/2012 | EFRAG's comment letter in response to the 4th batch of IFRS for SMEs draft Q&As
EFRAG has issued its comment letter in response to the fourth batch of draft Q&As related to the IFRS for SMEs. The comment letter can be downloaded here.
The IFRS Foundation’s SME Implementation Group, which assists the IASB in supporting the implementation of the IFRS for SMEs, published on 21 November 2011 two draft Q&As for public comment.
The first draft Q&A
Fallback to IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
considers whether an entity can apply the recognition and measurement provisions of IFRS 9
Financial Instruments
. It is stated in the draft response that the IFRS for SMEs specifically allows an entity to apply the recognition and measurement criteria of IAS 39. As the standard does not allow entities to apply the recognition and measurement requirements of IFRS 9, entities are not permitted to apply the requirements of IFRS 9 instead of the requirements included in section 11 and 12 of the IFRS for SMEs.
EFRAG agrees with the answer provided in this draft Q&A and thinks the Q&A should be issued.
The second draft Q&A
Recycling of cumulative exchange differences on disposal of a subsidiary
includes a response to the question whether cumulative exchange differences that arise on translation into a presentation currency are prohibited from being recognised in profit or loss on disposal of the subsidiary. The paragraphs in the IFRS for SMEs dealing with translation to the presentation currency are silent on this issue. It is stated in the draft response that a paragraph in the section on consolidation and separate financial statements deals with the issue and prohibits recycling of the mentioned differences.
EFRAG agrees with the answer provided in this draft Q&A, but does not think the Q&A should be issued.
Document :
EFRAG_comment_letter_batch_4.pdf
Linked Project :
click here
EFRAG (IVZW/AISBL) – 35 Square de Meeûs – 1000 Brussels (fifth floor) – Belgium
disclaimer
|
site map
|
powered by devcreator